Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Chairman’s Message
Editorial
Original Article
Perspective
RCTs
Review Article
Systematic Review
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Chairman’s Message
Editorial
Original Article
Perspective
RCTs
Review Article
Systematic Review
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Case Report
2 (
2
); 70-75
doi:
10.25259/KJS_21_2024

Revolutionizing Frontal Bone Fracture Stability: Extracorporeal Fixation with Fibrin Sealant as a Benchmark in Management

Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Navi Mumbai, India

*Corresponding author: Kumar Saket, Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India saket0410@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Saket K, Alam P, Jha A. Revolutionizing Frontal Bone Fracture Stability: Extracorporeal Fixation with Fibrin Sealant as a Benchmark in Management. Karnataka J Surg. 2025;2:70–75. doi: 10.25259/KJS_21_2024

Abstract

Frontal bone fractures, although relatively rare in maxillofacial trauma, present unique challenges due to risks of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks, sinus infections, and facial deformities. Effective management is essential to protect intracranial structures, prevent sinus complications, and restore an aesthetic contour. This case report describes a 24-year-old male with a depressed frontal bone fracture involving both the anterior and posterior tables, as well as CSF rhinorrhea, successfully managed with extracorporeal fixation and fibrin sealant. The surgical approach utilised a bicoronal incision, elevation of a pericranial flap, and titanium plates for stable fixation. Fibrin glue was applied to seal the nasofrontal duct and address the CSF leak, improving sinus stability and structural integrity.

Keywords

Cerebrospinal fluid leak (CSF)
Extracorporeal fixation
Fibrin sealant
Frontal bone fractures
Maxillofacial trauma

INTRODUCTION

Frontal bone fractures represent around 5% of maxillofacial trauma cases and require careful management due to their impact on complex structures such as the frontal sinus and cranial vault.[1] These fractures typically result from high-impact injuries, such as road traffic accidents, and may involve both the anterior and posterior tables of the frontal bone, raising risks of Cerebrospinal fluid leak (CSF) leaks, sinus infections, and potential deformities. Treatment must strike a balance between functional restoration and aesthetic outcomes. Traditional internal fixation has been standard practice; however, recent advancements in extracorporeal fixation and biomaterials, including fibrin glue, show promise in enhancing fracture stability and minimising complications.[2,3]

CASE REPORT

A 24-year-old male presented after a car accident with a depressed frontal bone fracture involving both the anterior and posterior tables [Figure 1]. Clinical examination revealed forehead depression, mild upper eyelid swelling, forehead and scalp numbness, and CSF rhinorrhea, confirmed by a positive halo sign. Computed tomography (CT) imaging showed a comminuted fracture with additional injury to the right naso-ethmoidal area, infraorbital floor, and a high-level LeFort I fracture [Figure 2]. Due to the complexity and presence of a CSF leak, a multidisciplinary team of neurosurgeons and oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMFS) was assembled to devise a comprehensive surgical plan using 3D CT [Figure 3].

Clinical presentation of a 24-year-old male with a depressed frontal bone fracture.
Figure 1:
Clinical presentation of a 24-year-old male with a depressed frontal bone fracture.
CT scan showing a comminuted frontal bone fracture, right naso-ethmoidal fracture, infraorbital floor injury, and high-level LeFort I fracture. CT: Computed tomography.
Figure 2:
CT scan showing a comminuted frontal bone fracture, right naso-ethmoidal fracture, infraorbital floor injury, and high-level LeFort I fracture. CT: Computed tomography.
3D Computed tomography (CT) reconstruction is used for surgical planning by the multidisciplinary team.
Figure 3:
3D Computed tomography (CT) reconstruction is used for surgical planning by the multidisciplinary team.

Surgical Technique

The patient underwent surgery under general anaesthesia. A bicoronal incision was made, beginning approximately 2 cm behind the hairline and extending laterally to the temporal region. This incision allowed for comprehensive access to the frontal area, including the forehead, nasal bridge, and upper orbital regions. Careful dissection was performed through the skin and subcutaneous tissue, exposing the underlying temporalis fascia and muscle [Figure 4].

Bicoronal incision provides access to the frontal and upper orbital regions, exposing the temporalis fascia.
Figure 4:
Bicoronal incision provides access to the frontal and upper orbital regions, exposing the temporalis fascia.

Muscle and Vascular Considerations

The incision was designed to avoid damaging the frontalis muscle, which plays a crucial role in forehead movement and aesthetics. As the dissection progressed, attention was given to the vascular supply, particularly the branches of the superficial temporal artery and the frontal branch of the facial nerve. Maintaining the integrity of these structures was essential for minimising postoperative complications, such as haematoma formation and motor deficits.

Once the periosteum was exposed, a pericranial flap was raised. The pericranial flap was carefully elevated, preserving its vascular supply from the underlying periosteal vessels. This flap is critical for reconstructive purposes, as it not only aids in wound healing but also serves as a biological barrier against infections and contributes to the repair of dural defects [Figure 5].

Pericranial flap elevated with preserved vascularity for wound healing and dural repair.
Figure 5:
Pericranial flap elevated with preserved vascularity for wound healing and dural repair.

Upon achieving adequate exposure to the fracture site, a dural tear was identified, confirming the presence of CSF leakage. This was meticulously assessed to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the injury’s extent. The dura mater was gently manipulated to visualise the CSF leak, facilitating a thorough repair [Figure 6].

A dural tear with a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak was identified at the fracture site.
Figure 6:
A dural tear with a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak was identified at the fracture site.

Extracorporeal Fixation Technique

An extracorporeal fixation approach was employed to stabilise the fractured bone fragments. This technique involved osteotomizing the fractured segments, allowing for precise realignment. X-shaped titanium plates and 1.5 mm screws were used for stabilisation [Figure 7]. The use of titanium is preferred due to its strength, lightweight properties, and biocompatibility. The plates were secured externally, enabling the fractured fragments to be repositioned accurately during reconstruction [Figure 8].

Extracorporeal fixation of fractured bone using (a) X-shaped titanium plates and (b)1.5 mm screws.
Figure 7:
Extracorporeal fixation of fractured bone using (a) X-shaped titanium plates and (b)1.5 mm screws.
Titanium plates and screws secure bone fragments in anatomical alignment.
Figure 8:
Titanium plates and screws secure bone fragments in anatomical alignment.

Following stabilisation, fibrin glue was meticulously applied to seal the nasofrontal duct [Figure 9]. This application is critical to preventing potential sinus complications that may arise from CSF leakage, such as meningitis or rhinosinusitis. The fibrin glue acts as a biological adhesive, promoting tissue healing while providing a watertight seal.

Fibrin glue is applied to seal the nasofrontal duct and prevent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak complications.
Figure 9:
Fibrin glue is applied to seal the nasofrontal duct and prevent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak complications.

Intradural Repair

The anterior cranial fossa base was subsequently repaired using the pericranial flap and a muscle graft harvested from the temporalis muscle [Figure 10]. The temporalis muscle graft was selected for its robust vascularity and compatibility with cranial repair needs. The muscle graft was meticulously placed over the dural tear, with the pericranial flap overlaying it to reinforce the CSF seal. This layered approach enhances the durability of the repair, as supported by studies from Kaufman et al. (2009) and Pradhan et al. (2019)[4,5], which highlight the efficacy of fibrin glue as a biocompatible and non-inflammatory adhesive [Figure 11].

Intradural repair using pericranial flap and temporalis muscle graft for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak closure.
Figure 10:
Intradural repair using pericranial flap and temporalis muscle graft for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak closure.
Layered repair reinforced with pericranial flap and fibrin glue for durability.
Figure 11:
Layered repair reinforced with pericranial flap and fibrin glue for durability.

The meticulous closure of the surgical site involved reapproximating the periosteum and overlying soft tissues, ensuring proper alignment and minimising tension on the incision. This approach aids in optimal healing and aesthetic outcomes.

Finally, the skin was closed in layers, ensuring careful suturing of the subcutaneous tissue and skin to promote healing and minimise scarring [Figure 12]. A sterile dressing was applied, and the patient was closely monitored postoperatively for any signs of complications.

Layered closure of the surgical site.
Figure 12:
Layered closure of the surgical site.

DISCUSSION

Frontal bone fractures involving the sinus or cranial cavity require careful repair to avoid severe complications. The literature supports extracorporeal fixation with biomaterials as effective for stability and aesthetics in frontal bone fractures. Studies by Shi et al. (2014) and Niederhauser et al. (2017)[6,7] endorse extracorporeal fixation as superior to traditional internal fixation, reducing movement at the fracture site and minimising risks of deformity. Titanium plates and screws offer long-term durability and adaptability, especially for fractures involving both frontal bone tables, as noted by Hwang et al. (2013).[8] Addressing CSF leaks is critical in frontal fractures. Research by Joshi and Roy (2015)[9] and Moore and Drake (2012)[10] demonstrated the effectiveness of fibrin glue in achieving watertight seals for dural and sinus repairs.[9,10] Kaufman et al. (2009)[4] emphasised the importance of sealing the sinus to prevent infections and reduce CSF leak recurrence, with bioadhesives like fibrin glue providing a reliable barrier.[4] Fibrin glue has been shown to support tissue integration and wound healing due to its biocompatibility and low inflammatory response, making it ideal for cranial applications, as noted by Fernandez and Kim (2015).[11] Pradhan et al. (2019)[5] further showed that fibrin glue reduces sinusitis and mucocele risks when used for nasofrontal duct sealing.

Complications and Comparative Techniques

Postoperative outcomes in frontal bone fracture repair focus on reducing sinus-related complications. Kumar et al. (2020)[12] reported lower rates of sinusitis and mucoceles when fibrin glue was used for ductal sealing. Studies by Ogawa and Imai (2016)[13] compared titanium-based extracorporeal fixation to bioresorbable alternatives, finding titanium to provide better stability and longevity, particularly in cases requiring extended structural support. Although challenges in aligning fragments precisely in cases of severe comminution may necessitate additional grafts or customised plates, Wu and Park (2019)[14] reported fewer late sinus complications and CSF leaks with combined fibrin glue and extracorporeal fixation, indicating the benefits outweigh limitations in appropriate cases.

CONCLUSION

Combining extracorporeal fixation and fibrin sealant offers a reliable approach for complex frontal bone fractures, meeting both structural and aesthetic needs. The extracorporeal fixation ensures stability and contour preservation, while fibrin glue effectively seals sinus ducts and prevents CSF leaks, reducing the risk of complications. As the literature suggests, further advancements in fixation techniques and bioadhesive applications may continue to improve outcomes for patients with complex craniofacial injuries, solidifying this approach in maxillofacial trauma surgery.

Author contributions:

KS: Data collection, formal analysis, Writing – Review & editing; PA: Investigation, resources, supervision; AJ: Investigation, resources, supervision.

Ethical approval:

The research/study approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee at KIMS Hubli, number rguhs/22/23048, date 22nd September 2024.

Declaration of patient consent:

Patient’s consent not required as patients identity is not disclosed or compromised.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , , , , , , , . Surgical Management of Anterior Cranial Base Fractures with Cerebrospinal Fluid Fistulae. Neurosurgery. 2008;62:463-71.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . Post-Traumatic Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage. World J Surg. 2001;25:1062-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , . Management of Frontal Bone Fractures. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30:2026-29.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , . The Use of Fibrin Glue in Surgical Repair: A Systematic Review. J Surg Res. 2009;152:8-13.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , . Efficacy of Fibrin Glue in Enhancing Wound Healing: A Clinical Study. Nepal J Surg. 2019;12:52-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , et al. Extracorporeal Fixation for Skull Reconstruction: A Novel Technique. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014;42:e257-62.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , et al. Internal Fixation of Skull Fractures: A Comprehensive Review. Neurosurg Rev. 2017;40:567-75.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , . Analysis of Facial Bone Fractures: An 11-Year Study of 2,094 Patients. Indian J Plast Surg. 2010;43:42-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , . Implications of Changing Climate on Productivity of Temperate Fruit Crops With Special Reference to Apple. J Horticulture. 2015;2:135.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , . Distance Education: A Systems View of Online Learning (3rd ed). Belmont: Wadsworth; .
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , . Enhanced Bone Healing by Improved Fibrin-Clot Formation Via Fibrinogen Adsorption on Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Granules. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2015;26:1263-1269.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , . Types of Fractures in Cranial Vault Followed by a Head Injury: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2020;16:761-764.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , . Long-Term Progressive Degradation of the Biological Capability of Titanium. Materials. 2016;9:525.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , et al. Reduction of Closed Frontal Sinus Fractures Through Suprabrow Approach. Arch Craniofac Surg. 2017;18:230-235.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections